---

Our Founding Fathers regularly referred to this nation as a "Union." A Union joined together with the bases that we are all endowed by a Creator with certain unalienable rights, this is the foundation of our social contract, and the Constitution is to guaranty our life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. But, as human nature goes, some will never be satisfied with liberty alone; some will find that the pursuit of happiness is simply too much work. There are two ways to make a living, you can earn it as most people do or you can take it by force of law known as legal plunder.

The politics of "fair share" are progressive animosities that divide by the vice to covet. Spreading the wealth around by crying "fare share" is one way to legally plunder those who have earned too much. Yet you still can't get a job or revenue from a poor man.

Would you believe that our Founding Fathers new human nature better than any and all sociologist do- even to this day? Let me spell it out for you-progressive sociologists are nothing more than progressive monks versed in the concept of sophistry; the manipulating of human nature by appealing to our baser instinct of envy. (Marxism)

James Madison wrote Federalist No. 10 that foretold the very human nature of progressivism. Progressivism is the 'faction' that put this country in the situation we find ourselves in today-broke and at each other's throats.

When Bob Chanin gave his resignation speech to the NEA as chief council, the truth of progressivism finally came to light when he said, "Why are these conservative and right-wing bastards picking on NEA and its affiliates? I will tell you why: It is the price we pay for success. NEA and its affiliates have been singled out because they are the most effective unions in the United States.... Despite what some among us would like to believe, it is not because of our creative ideas. It is not because of the merit of our positions. It is not because we care about children. And it is not because we have a vision of a great public school for every child. NEA and its affiliates are effective advocates because we have power."

I would like everybody to stop and think for a moment, these people are educating our children. These people denigrate liberty and those who are successful because of it.

After reading Bob Chanin's animosities that struck a standing ovation from our educators, I will never look at unionized public education in any other light than legal plunder, contempt for liberty and contempt for the people of the United States to do the right thing. Progressives have made an industry out of animosity and the coveting of the success and legitimacy of American citizens since the industrial revolution.

Another prime example of progressive animosity was when Elizabeth Warren, candidate for Senator from Massachusetts, commented on the stump about the wealthy... "You built a factory out there? Good for you, but I want to be clear: you moved your goods to market on the roads the rest of us paid for; you hired workers the rest of us paid to educate; you were safe in your factory because of police forces and fire forces that the rest of us paid for. You didn't have to worry that marauding bands would come and seize everything at your factory, and hire someone to protect against this, because of the work the rest of us did."

She continues: "Now look, you built a factory and it turned into something terrific, or a great idea? God bless. Keep a big hunk of it. But part of the underlying social contract is you take a hunk of that and pay forward for the next kid who comes along." (Now there's a résumé for employment for dictator.)



I have several questions to ask Ms. Warren. One of which is, "what are marauding bands if they are not the same disposition as "occupiers?" And two; where did the people get the jobs to pay the taxes for government services and roads if not from the man who created the factory. Ms. Warren is a half-wit opportunistic progressive sophist, a real bitch of a progressive.



Progressives are hypocrites; they pick and choose who will be wealthy based on who supports their faction and that includes Wall Street bankers.



I think it's time that the American people picked up a copy of Federalist No. 10 and found out just what a faction really is. Progressivism is a faction; it is a collective with a vice for envy, coveting the rest of society for being successful, yet depends upon for revenue, goods and services they need to live on. Basically, by definition, a progressive is a parasite. A mindless parasite, a scourge that needs a host that it will kill until the last drop of nourishment has been used up. Take a good-long-hard-look at the national deficit and the uncontrolled size of government and tell me progressives are not parasites who have a death grip on this country.



James Madison's Federalist No. 10. Among the numerous advantages promised by a well-constructed Union, none deserves to be more accurately developed than its tendency to break and control the violence of faction. The friend of popular governments never finds himself so much alarmed for their character and fate, as when he contemplates their propensity to this dangerous vice.

"By a faction, I understand a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or a minority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adversed to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community."

If a faction consists of less than a majority, relief is supplied by the republican principle, which enables the majority to defeat its sinister views by regular vote. It may clog the administration, it may convulse the society; but it will be unable to execute and mask its violence under the forms of the Constitution.

From this view of the subject it may be concluded that a pure democracy, by which I mean a society consisting of a small number of citizens, who assemble and administer the government in person, can admit of no cure for the mischiefs of faction. A common passion or interest will, in almost every case, be felt by a majority of the whole; a communication and concert result from the form of government itself; and there is nothing to check the inducements to sacrifice the weaker party or an obnoxious individual. Hence it is that such democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths. (James Madison Federalist No. 10)



Remember one fact of progressives; they will interpret the Constitution broad enough to take what they want by construing the historic context as not being in your best interests.

[[In-content Ad]]

---