---

We understand that nobody likes to see their taxes increase. So it puzzles us that the consolidation and subsequent closing of the Northland School district is considered by some a viable option.

Readers need to understand that their residency can never be "school-tax" free. Should the ISD 118 cease to exist, properties would be assigned to the surrounding school districts such as Hill City's, Grand Rapids' or Deer River's. All of the mentioned already have a higher tax impact than Northland's would be after the referendum passes. It is also safe to assume that those districts would levy for more money to upgrade their space requirements in order to facilitate our students.

But let's say, for arguments sake, our district would close. A consolidation process is complicated and takes at least a couple of years. Meanwhile the school board is required to carry out the health and safety measures it has approved in the amount of $6.14 million. These repairs will be implemented and will be paid for by our local taxpayers. No matter whether the school should close or not.

So voters that favor the consolidation of our district are planning on investing into a facility that is not going to be used in the future. Is that financially sound? What's more, taxpayers would not only have to pay the levied money but the newly assigned districts taxes as well. Talk about a tax increase! (By the way, a very nice tax comparison graph that illustrates this can be found on the school website http://www.isd118.k12.mn.us/page/3013).

Much rather would we like to see the levied money being rolled over in a remodeling process of the Northland School's facility, as proposed by the current referendum. Especially if one takes into account that student test scores are increasing and enrollment numbers are stable. Despite what others may argue. Voting yes on November 9th is the only option that makes strategical sense.[[In-content Ad]]

---